Beyond Benefits: The True, Hidden Cost of Disability in Britain. By Dusty Wentworth
An Introduction: Beyond Suspicion and Hostility
Disabled people in Britain are living with the consequences of an underfunded NHS, a fragmented social care system and a political climate that has normalised suspicion and hostility. Public debate has shifted its focus to welfare spending, overlooking the human lives at stake. The result is a country where disabled people are routinely failed by the systems designed to support them.
My life as a 52 year old father of three young children, living with complex neurological and psychological conditions following a catastrophic medical event, is a case study in how severely the British state is failing its most vulnerable citizens.
Catastrophe and the Absence of Support
In October 2023 my life changed instantly. A brain aneurysm ruptured at home, causing a subarachnoid haemorrhage. I collapsed and awoke in intensive care a month later. The rupture left me with an acquired brain injury that affects memory, cognition, processing and physical stability.
The consequences were life changing. I lost vision in my left eye. I suffered significant hearing loss and now sit on the waiting list for cochlear implants. Daily functioning became unpredictable, shaped by neurological fatigue, dizziness and sensory overload.
Before this, I lived with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder from military service. Doctors have since confirmed that my Functional Neurological Disorder is directly linked to that trauma. I also live with fibromyalgia, which amplifies pain, exhaustion and muscle weakness.
I spent eleven months moving between three hospitals and a neurological rehabilitation centre. When I was discharged, I returned home as a disabled father of children aged ten, six and two, but with no functioning community support. Outpatient teams repeatedly declined to take me on. My needs were described as too complex and I was referred to adult social care.
Social care in Britain is largely structured for older adults. It is not designed for younger disabled people with serious neurological conditions or young families. Nine months later, despite an agreed care plan, I still have no carers. My condition has worsened without the critical rehabilitation that should have been provided. This is not an exception. It is the norm. The plan already needs rewriting.
The Department for Work and Pensions: No Route Back
In late 2025 the Department for Work and Pensions contacted me about 'voluntary support' to explore returning to work. I was told to expect a face to face meeting, but instead I received a short phone call.
I explained the consequences of the ruptured aneurysm, the brain injury, my visual and hearing impairments, my PTSD, FND and fibromyalgia. I explained the total absence of outpatient rehabilitation and the failures of social care. I made it clear that I wanted a realistic route back into meaningful activity.
I was told I was not suitable for their programmes. The call ended. There were no support options, no referrals and no plan. This was not support. It was a perfunctory exercise demonstrating that the system is unable to cope with complex, lived reality.
For disabled people with significant impairments, this is routine. The DWP presents an image of support but delivers very little for those who genuinely need it.
The Normalisation of Hostility
Political speeches and media coverage over many years have reshaped public attitudes. Disabled people have been repeatedly portrayed as economically inactive, dependent or responsible for pressure on public finances. Tabloids have fuelled suspicion with narratives about fraud or benefit excess.
These messages seep into everyday life. Disabled people become symbols of cost, stripped of their inherent value as citizens.
Recently, while out in public, I was targeted by two men in their twenties who began shouting abuse at me, calling me a PIP wanker and telling me to get a job. They were unhappy that I was out for a meal and insisted I was spending benefit money on dining out. They knew nothing about my ruptured aneurysm, my brain injury, my PTSD or the fact I am a father of three small children.
I kept calm, continued transferring into my wheelchair and replied lightly. What they failed to notice was the arrival of my old team mates from my military and private security days. As one of them cracked his knuckles and asked, 'Is everything alright?' with a tone of absolute confidence and clear intention, the two men quickly realised their mistake.
They made a rapid exit. My mates burst out laughing and I seized the moment to wheel off as fast as I could to get a head start before calling back that the last one to the bar buys the round. I lost and had to buy the drinks, but the humour did not disguise the reality. Hostility towards disabled people has become normalised.
PIP: The £1,247 Deficit
PIP is often described as easy money or generous support. My situation proves the opposite.
My actual monthly disability cost is £1,247. My PIP award covers £749.80. This leaves a £497.20 deficit that I must cover myself. This includes essential costs such as rehabilitation, mobility support, equipment, transport, energy bills, adaptations and assistance that social care cannot provide.
I have begun working with Able2B in Norfolk, a community interest company that supports disabled people in rebuilding mobility and strength. It is vital for my rehabilitation, but I pay for it myself because no statutory service will.
PIP does not cover the real cost of disability. It never has.
I have said openly that anyone who believes PIP is free money is welcome to take mine, provided they also take what comes with it. They can have my PTSD, my FND, my fibromyalgia, my brain injury, my blindness, my hearing loss and my wheelchair. No one would accept that exchange. That is the truth the public discourse avoids.
MPs and Avoidance: Representation Lost
I wrote to my MP detailing failures across the NHS, social care and welfare. I provided evidence, examples and timelines. The result was a letter to my GP implying I was unhappy with appointments and a letter to social services about the status of my care plan.
When I challenged this, I was told it was all he could do and given a list of ombudsmen. This was not representation. It was avoidance. Given his public support for welfare reform measures, the lack of engagement was predictable.
Too many disabled people find themselves in the same position. Their situations expose political failings, so their MPs sidestep them.
Fighting Back: Surviving Systemic Failure
Despite everything, I am not giving up. I am 52, a father of three young children and determined to rebuild my life. I survived military service, private security work and a catastrophic brain injury. I am still fighting. I refuse to be written off by systems that cannot cope with complexity.
Disabled people across Britain are doing the same. They rebuild themselves despite the obstacles, not because of the support available.
The Systemic Failure and the Path Forward
The reality of disability in Britain is not measured in benefit figures or political soundbites. It is defined by the long term collapse of the public systems people rely on. My ruptured brain aneurysm changed my life, but the failures that followed were not inevitable. They were the outcome of political decisions and decades of underinvestment in health care, rehabilitation, mental health provision and social care.
Disabled people are not responsible for rising welfare costs. Those costs reflect the consequences of successive governments failing to build and maintain services that keep people well, stable and able to work where possible. When rehabilitation is unavailable, when social care is inaccessible, when outpatient support disappears and when early intervention breaks down, people deteriorate. More citizens end up with avoidable complications, unnecessary disability and long term dependence. That is not a personal failing. It is a systemic one.
Disabled people are already doing everything they can to rebuild their lives. The responsibility now lies entirely with government to repair the systems it has allowed to erode over many years, to restore meaningful investment and to create services that respond to need rather than ration it.
If Britain wants to ease pressure on welfare, it must start by confronting the decades of neglect that have pushed so many people into worsening health and deeper disability. The question is not whether disabled people are trying hard enough. The question is whether political leaders are prepared to face the consequences of long term underfunding and finally rebuild the health and social care systems that every one of us may one day depend on.
#Dustywentworth
Comments
Post a Comment